During what analysis are an action's potential positive results and negative consequences evaluated?

The process of evaluating both the potential positive results and negative consequences of an action is known as a risk—benefit analysis. This type of analysis is fundamental in making informed decisions in firefighting and emergency response scenarios. By assessing the potential rewards versus the potential hazards, firefighters can determine whether the benefits of a particular action outweigh the risks involved.

In firefighting, this analysis aids in decision-making regarding tactics to be employed in various situations, such as whether to enter a burning structure to rescue victims or to take defensive positions to protect exposures. It requires a comprehensive understanding of the situation and the likely outcomes of different courses of action.

Other options like strategic analysis, primary survey, and size-up have distinct purposes. Strategic analysis typically encompasses broader organizational or operational strategies rather than individual actions. A primary survey focuses on rapidly assessing the scene to ensure safety and identify immediate threats or resources needed. Size-up relates to evaluating the overall situation before engaging in firefighting operations but does not specifically evaluate positive results versus negative consequences in the manner that a risk—benefit analysis does. Thus, the context and scope of a risk—benefit analysis make it the appropriate answer in this scenario.