What statement is NOT true in regards to risk management?

The statement that suggests risking everything to save nothing is not true in the context of risk management, particularly in fire fighting. Effective risk management involves making strategic decisions based on the potential outcomes, ensuring that the safety of firefighters and the public is prioritized. The principle inherent in this incorrect statement goes against established risk management practices, which emphasize the need for a balanced approach where risks are assessed and minimized based on the probabilities of success and the potential costs involved.

In practical terms, fire ground operations focus on saving lives first, protecting property second, and minimizing risks involved during these processes. The other statements reflect accepted strategies in risk management. Accepting limited risk to save property recognizes that sometimes, based on the situation, it may be worth deploying resources for certain protective measures, provided that it does not compromise safety excessively. The emphasis on taking on high risk to save lives acknowledges that in life-threatening situations, firefighters may make calculated decisions to intervene, albeit with caution.

Overall, the notion of risking everything undermines the foundational principles of risk assessment, accountability, and the professional responsibilities that firefighters uphold to ensure both their safety and effectiveness in emergency response.